Assessment of a machine learning approach to predict subjective sphero-cylindrical correction using wavefront aberrometry data

AUTHORS
Carlos Santiago Hernandez Torres
Andrea Gil Ruiz
Ignacio Casares
Jesus Poderoso
Alec Wehse
Shivang Dave
Daryl Lim
Manuel Sánchez Montañés
Eduardo Lage Negro
JOURNAL ARVO
ABSTRACT

Purpose

Uncorrected Refractive Errors (UREs) is a reversible condition that can be treated with appropriate eyeglasses. UREs affect over 1 billion people globally, with 90% of this population living in low-and-middle-income countries where vision exams can be highly inaccessible due to a shortage of experienced eyecare professionals. This work aims to assess if a machine learning (ML) approach, when applied to data obtained with an affordable handheld autorefractor, could increase access to clinical-quality subjective refraction (SR) when operated by non-experts.

Methods

Data used for this analysis was obtained from a clinical study performed at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India, using a low-cost portable wavefront aberrometer, an early prototype of the QuickSee (QS) (PlenOptika, Inc., USA). A total of 669 participants were enrolled with ages ranging between 15 and 70 years (35.2 ± 13.7) and spherical equivalent error between -6.0 D and 3.5 D (-0.7 ± 1.67 D). Four ML regressor models were trained and tested for each power vector M, J0 and J45: random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), and a custom assembly model (ASB) that averages the predictions of RF, GB, and XGB. Algorithms were trained on a dataset of 1,244 samples using as input features: age, gender, Zernike coefficients up to 5th order, and measurement quality related metrics provided by the autorefractor. A smaller subset of 518 unseen samples was used to test the agreement of the predictions against SR using Bland-Altman analysis, overall prediction error in terms of mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE), and the percentage of agreement for 0.25 D and 0.5 D thresholds.

Results

All models improved the agreement with SR compared to the baseline autorefraction, but ASB obtained the best results (Table 1). Bland-Altman analysis showed a decrease in the 95% limits of agreement of ±0.63 D, ±0.14 D, and ±0.08 D for M, J0 and J45, respectively. The wavefront-aberrometry related variables had the biggest impact on the prediction, while demographic and measurement quality-related features showed a heterogeneous but consistent predictive value.

Conclusions

These results suggest that ML is effective for improving precision in predicting patient’s SR from objective measurements taken with a low-cost portable device.

LINK here

Contact Us

eduardo.lage@uam.es
+34 91 497-5787

error: Content is protected !!